Looks good too me.
i but clam yes tl;dr with agree
I read this and basically think it is good
Quote from: RipsClock;1900746well im glad all the shit i wrote reached a grand total of two people
I honestly have nothing to add beyond "sounds good"
Define "active" though.
I like this, but I think that voting fraud should have a much steeper penalty, like a long ban.
Requiring only a simple majority to make the ballot makes a lot more sense to me than the current system of 33%. It's not like it even matters if somebody who doesn't have a chance to win makes the ballot.
Quote from: Thor;1900759I like this, but I think that voting fraud should have a much steeper penalty, like a long ban.
Requiring only a simple majority to make the ballot makes a lot more sense to me than the current system of 33%. It's not like it even matters if somebody who doesn't have a chance to win makes the ballot.
I think voting fraud by potential candidates or current staff requires a steeper penalty, but not for regular members.
Quote from: Buttplug;1900773I think voting fraud by potential candidates or current staff requires a steeper penalty, but not for regular members.
why? what makes regular members so special
Quote from: DWARFINATORclock;1900777why? what makes regular members so special
They don't need to be held up to the higher standard.
i propose the staff stop being vengeful babies and put clam back in the grid