Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: buttplug on November 06, 2009, 01:41:06 AM
Post by: buttplug on November 06, 2009, 01:41:06 AM
[u2]2EaE0_gQLw0[/u2]
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: SpongeClock SquarePants on November 06, 2009, 03:38:36 AM
Post by: SpongeClock SquarePants on November 06, 2009, 03:38:36 AM
Quote from: Golden Clock;1688905*ruining classical songs with awful techno junk
enough said
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: buttplug on November 06, 2009, 02:41:46 PM
Post by: buttplug on November 06, 2009, 02:41:46 PM
be more pretentious plz.
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: DigitalLemonClock on November 06, 2009, 02:46:11 PM
Post by: DigitalLemonClock on November 06, 2009, 02:46:11 PM
[u2]sa9LHPBVeqc[/u2]
tiesto can eat a fuck
tiesto can eat a fuck
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: VirusClock on November 06, 2009, 04:31:08 PM
Post by: VirusClock on November 06, 2009, 04:31:08 PM
Tiesto is over-rated. Listen to this version, it is MUCH MUCH better.
[u2]BrAHXAJP_ZI[/u2]
[u2]BrAHXAJP_ZI[/u2]
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: VirusClock on November 06, 2009, 05:11:23 PM
Post by: VirusClock on November 06, 2009, 05:11:23 PM
Quote from: Golden Clock;1689125you can't replace a baton with a glowstick okay
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: buttplug on November 06, 2009, 05:12:34 PM
Post by: buttplug on November 06, 2009, 05:12:34 PM
Quote from: Golden Clock;1689125you can't replace a baton with a glowstick okay
It's not replacement, it's an appreciation of the baton in a new way.
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: buttplug on November 06, 2009, 05:52:44 PM
Post by: buttplug on November 06, 2009, 05:52:44 PM
Quote from: Golden Clock;1689135Rubbing my buttcheeks in food doesn't make me enjoy its flavour in a new way
Well that's your opinion I guess.
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: AbsintheClock on November 06, 2009, 05:53:57 PM
Post by: AbsintheClock on November 06, 2009, 05:53:57 PM
This is why you should never do ecstasy in a concert hall. This has about as much class as the thong song.
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: Loki Clock on November 06, 2009, 05:54:45 PM
Post by: Loki Clock on November 06, 2009, 05:54:45 PM
Quote from: Golden Clock;1689139Furthermore, techno music focuses more on beat and rhythm, whereas classical's main focus is harmony and melody.
lollolololololololollolololoollololoollololool
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: buttplug on November 06, 2009, 05:58:38 PM
Post by: buttplug on November 06, 2009, 05:58:38 PM
God damn you all are so fucking serious.
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: Loki Clock on November 06, 2009, 06:00:08 PM
Post by: Loki Clock on November 06, 2009, 06:00:08 PM
Quote from: Golden Clock;1689142what's so funny?
Tell me Peer Gynt has no rhythm. Tell me Metronomy's "What Do I Do Now?" has no melody. Tell me you have the credentials to make sweeping generalizations about the two most general umbrella genres in popular classification.
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: AstronautClock on November 06, 2009, 06:05:19 PM
Post by: AstronautClock on November 06, 2009, 06:05:19 PM
Quote from: ᛚᚮᚴᛁ᛫ᚴᛚᚢᚴᚴᛆ;1689140lollolololololololollolololoollololoollololoolwhy is that funny?
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: SockpuppetClock on November 06, 2009, 06:05:44 PM
Post by: SockpuppetClock on November 06, 2009, 06:05:44 PM
Regardless of generalizations of genres, the song in the OP's post sounded more like a simple juxtaposition of classical music and techno beats, which I find just sounds ridiculous.
Couldn't they involve the melodies a little bit more with the song?...
Couldn't they involve the melodies a little bit more with the song?...
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: Loki Clock on November 06, 2009, 06:19:41 PM
Post by: Loki Clock on November 06, 2009, 06:19:41 PM
Quote from: Golden Clock;1689146I said 'main' and 'more'.
In my eyes, that's just another way of saying what you want without having to qualify it. No one can really contest it so long as you're vague enough.
QuoteIf I were to do that, I'd be ignoring Waltzes and things like that.
It's not just a lesser subset of classical with a focus on the beat, or techno on melody. Just maybe what you've heard. Beat and melody are two basic features of music. To me it comes off like you're generalizing the composers from both genres as deeply neglectful in the structure of their music because of a post hoc impression of the intent of all of the genres from the classical period and a bystander's impression of techno music.
Quote from: SockpuppetClock;1689149Regardless of generalizations of genres, the song in the OP's post sounded more like a simple juxtaposition of classical music and techno beats, which I find just sounds ridiculous.
Yeah, I'm not going to listen to it.
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: Loki Clock on November 06, 2009, 06:41:24 PM
Post by: Loki Clock on November 06, 2009, 06:41:24 PM
Quote from: Golden Clock;1689152It's all a different mindset is what I'm trying to communicate.
I understand that, but you're assuming the homogeneity of the mindsets and intentions of composers across almost 500 years, assuming a modern definition, and about 100 years for techno, which its self has its origins in classical music.
QuoteI'm just saying that which is more pronounced and focused on.
I don't believe such a tendency really exists, though. I believe it's merely the cultural images of what the genres are about, which biases our assumptions of a composer from that genre's intentions.
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: SockpuppetClock on November 06, 2009, 07:42:53 PM
Post by: SockpuppetClock on November 06, 2009, 07:42:53 PM
Quote from: ᛚᚮᚴᛁ᛫ᚴᛚᚢᚴᚴᛆ;1689158I don't believe such a tendency really exists, though. I believe it's merely the cultural images of what the genres are about, which biases our assumptions of a composer from that genre's intentions.Um... isn't that the whole point of a genre?
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: ChimeClock on November 06, 2009, 07:52:58 PM
Post by: ChimeClock on November 06, 2009, 07:52:58 PM
Quote from: Golden Clock;1688905*ruining classical songs with awful techno junkbing bing bing!
and again Loki doubts me on knowing how to judge music
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: Loki Clock on November 06, 2009, 09:08:38 PM
Post by: Loki Clock on November 06, 2009, 09:08:38 PM
Quote from: SockpuppetClock;1689166Um... isn't that the whole point of a genre?
No. The point of a genre is to classify artforms based on common themes, methods, periods, etc., that is, on the similarities of the works of art themselves, not on the popular impression of a subgroup is. Compare hardcore punk music, a genre, with the '80s "punk" cultural concept.
Quoteand again Loki doubts me on knowing how to judge music
I didn't know you were wavy gravy. And I didn't even say he doesn't know how to judge music, I just said he's not qualified to make sweeping generalizations about 5 centuries of music. Note that I'm taking issue with those specific statements of his, not his opinion of this song in particular. I agree with the fast adagio statement, which is all I really can feel either way about because I am not going to listen to the song.
Title: Remixing classical songs
Post by: Silly Putty Clock on November 06, 2009, 11:18:25 PM
Post by: Silly Putty Clock on November 06, 2009, 11:18:25 PM
Quote from: ᛚᚮᚴᛁ᛫ᚴᛚᚢᚴᚴᛆ;1689151Yeah, I'm not going to listen to it.
You're not missing much. Very, very, very generic rave music. Imagine if somebody just came along and chopped up some random Darude song and stuck little segments of classical music in. It even starts out with the cliched thumping beat, then WHHHHHOOOOOOOSSSSSHHHHH and it goes all quiet and the classical music starts.