Original:
http://fotogaleri.hurriyet.com.tr/GaleriDetay.aspx?cid=36575&p=1&rid=2
Note the knife in the bottom right corner.
Reuters:
http://www.daylife.com/photo/0gQV54U1jr7pL?q=gaza
3, 2, 1, outrage.
[UPDATE]
Found this:
http://zombietime.com/reuters_photo_fraud/
:o
Oh, so you guys noticed that did you? I should probably not photoshop pictures other people have...
idk they just cropped it!
Quote from: I AM KATAMARI CLOCK;1757628idk they just cropped it!
Conveniently cropped out the knife held by a "peaceful" activist?
Looks sort of to me like the knife was the commando's. He's not exactly holding it in a menacing way, but maybe I'm wrong.
EDIT: And by not menacing, holding it in the manner you would if you picked up a knife off someone else's person.
Quote from: F U Clock;1757638Looks sort of to me like the knife was the commando's. He's not exactly holding it in a menacing way, but maybe I'm wrong.
EDIT: And by not menacing, holding it in the manner you would if you picked up a knife off someone else's person.
Standing over a bleeding commando that is lying on the floor...?
[u2]rJ1945WsNWk[/u2]
Quote from: RibsClock;1757667The Battle of Khaybar was when the Banu Nadir...
This sounds like Star Wars
What a bad time to be caught wearing a man-thong.
Banana hammock
Quote from: RibsClock;1757667But there's a lot of fishy mishandling of the truth on both sides.
That will always be the case.
I say we drop the bomb.
I was expecting the knife to be photoshopped out. I'm disappointed!
http://zombietime.com/reuters_photo_fraud/
Quote from: DWARFINATOR;1757732http://zombietime.com/reuters_photo_fraud/
That was a really interesting read!
fucking journalists
I'm sorry for being abit lazy/tired and not arsing myself to read the articles, did they photo it to give Israeli sympathi or critique?
Quote from: ProqagandaClock;1757793I'm sorry for being abit lazy/tired and not arsing myself to read the articles, did they photo it to give Israeli sympathi or critique?
read the article
Godamit news outlets
(https://clockcrew.net/talk/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fzombietime.com%2Freuters_photo_fraud%2F20060805BeirutP.jpg&hash=291960a94a783eb1358e89fff2dd83a17f450a49)
I just find this image so funny. It's not even WELL edited. Anybody with a rudimentary knowledge of image editing would notice that terrible clone abuse. Did somebody seriously think this would fool people?
Photos are no reliable evidence anymore.
Quote from: TequilaClock;1757900Photos are no reliable evidence anymore.
Pics or it didn't happen
Quote from: topcatyo;1757903Pics or it didn't happen
D'aaaaaaaaaw _poogle_
Propaganda go away. No one wants you posting in this thread if you can't click links and read articles.
Quote from: RibsClock;1757667But there's a lot of fishy mishandling of the truth on both sides.
This. Reuters, on the other hand, if you'll look at that zombietime link, is clearly faking pictures.
Quote from: DWARFINATOR;1757732http://zombietime.com/reuters_photo_fraud/
That was a fascinating read. You know they say the first victim in war is the truth but you expect a neutral outside source to provide unbiased information.
Quote from: Pineberry;1757939That was a fascinating read. You know they say the first victim in war is the truth but you expect a neutral outside source to provide unbiased information.
who exactly counts as an unbiased outside source
Quote from: ToyotaClock;1757994who exactly counts as an unbiased outside source
The people who get more money the more sensational the information they collect is, of course.
Quote from: ToyotaClock;1757994who exactly counts as an unbiased outside source
The Clock Crew of course
Quote from: THOR;1758002The people who get more money the more sensational the information they collect is, of course.
you mean the people who compete to have the most true story which ultimately leaves mankind with the most accurate reporting because people will support the more accurate station monetarily
wait
Quote from: ToyotaClock;1757994who exactly counts as an unbiased outside source
Well, if Reuters was a Palestinian news outlet, it wouldn't be, but considering they're neither from Israel or Palestina, they
should be unbiased. After all, most people buy newspapers to be informed, not to be lied to, and ultimately honesty should be more important than sensation. Especially because even the sensationalists will stop buying newspapers if they know the sensation is a lie.
Quote from: Pineberry;1758199Well, if Reuters was a Palestinian news outlet, it wouldn't be, but considering they're neither from Israel or Palestina, they should be unbiased. After all, most people buy newspapers to be informed, not to be lied to, and ultimately honesty should be more important than sensation. Especially because even the sensationalists will stop buying newspapers if they know the sensation is a lie.
Fox News
Quote from: RabidClock;1758225Fox News
People that watch FOX news don't know it isn't the truth.
If I want fair and balanced US news I go to the BBC. And that is sad.
Quote from: RibsClock;1758234I go for the PBS News Hour. It don't have time for no punditry.
That's a good one too
Quote from: RabidClock;1758280That's a good one too
Google Maps is the best.
True that.