Quote from: FloundermanClock;1936522and you, you know what you are

a wearer of hats?

Quote from: FloundermanClock;1936522(a dingleberry infested ass cleft)

Oh...

Quote from: Slurpee;1936519I apologize for my absence I had to go to the gentlemen's room, but let me tell you something fucker
calling somebody a fartbutt completely shuts down any kind of reasonable conversation you could have had
it's one of those loaded phrases secular progresses like you like to throw around, because they know nobody wants to be perceived as having a farty butt
so they get offended and defensive about farts and butts and poops
I don't know how we're supposed to have any kind of structured conversation with you throwing such bold accusations around

I do apologize, I'm sorry for me doing that.

I have made some poor choices, also YOU'RE A POOPFACE.

Quote from: Slurpee;1936517let me tell you something fucker

WHAT SON, WHAT.

Stop being racist.

Quote from: MightyBooshClock;1914916You beat me to them all though :c but i will say that you are doing a damn fine job at it

Cheers.

Quote from: MightyBooshClock;1914913SirClock, stop being so immature. You keep throwing around the word taboo and stuff like that to make it seem like we are scared of believing that stars can make us who we are. They are balls of gas randomly floating in space. Believing that that can define our emotions and turn ons is absolutely fucking stupid. It's like me saying "every tree in the world is connected to what sort of chips you like." . Also, if it is a real science or whatever you want to call it, then shouldn't everything be spot on accurate? Silly goose.

I'm having more joy just pointing out every internal contradiction and every time he makes a claim without evidence. It's quite fun.

Quote from: SirClock;1914908That's what I'm doing fucktard. There is immeasurable amount of evidence out there.

Prove it. Peer-reviewed journals, please.

Quote from: SirClock;1914908Nobody looks for these things. Nobody studies them. But guess what, everyone thinks they know. Bunch of ignorant monkeys.

How can there be a bunch of evidence while also having nobody studying it?

Quote from: SirClock;1914908Yes, you as a single individual are the greatest force in the Universe and you do know everything.

Weren't you just praising your own individual "knowledge?"

Quote from: SirClock;1914904Hey guys guess what I'm not wasting my time doing: trying to convince you astrology is a science.

Good because it isn't.

Quote from: SirClock;1914904Thanks for your opinions, however SirClock is a highly individual clock-person-man who has strong opinions about very taboo and controversial things.

Also known as unverified superstitions and general foolishness.

Quote from: SirClock;1914904Everyone in the clock crew thinks they know everything so naturally, I regularly attract a whole boatload of ego-dribble.

However, I am not going to address it. You all know everything, you all have your own opinions, fine stick with it.

If you want your birth info PM me.

Most people require evidence before they believe things.

Quote from: SirClock;1914904You're plainly moronic.

That's what your mom said last night.

Quote from: SirClock;1914897No. Learn the definition of science. This is all physics and math ftlog.

No, it's not.

Astrology has nothing to do with math nor any science. Prove me wrong.
 
sciââ,¬Â¢ence |ˈsÃ,,«Éâ,,¢ns|
noun
the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.

Astrology doesn't live up to this definition.

it does live up to this though.

suââ,¬Â¢perââ,¬Â¢stiââ,¬Â¢tion |ËÅ'soÃ...pÉâ,,¢rˈsti sh Éâ,,¢n|
noun
excessively credulous belief in and reverence for unverified, or unverifiable, events or phenomena

Quote from: MightyBooshClock;1914900Astrology isn't legitimate science.

Astrology isn't even science. Legitimate or otherwise. It is superstition.

Quote from: FloundermanClock;1913298They werent even nice socks. They didnt even match! There is not a single complete pair in that abomination you refer to as "headware". In fact I am pretty sure one is not a sock at all, but a glove. You deliberately had them ferment according to icelandic custom for hákarl preparation, even going so far as to importing shark feces and urine for the process. You could have just starched the socks, but noooooo it had to be sharkpoopoopeepee.

You illiterate poorly trained irish prostitute of ill-repor and foul odeur, you know not of gentlemanly things and shouldn't speak to their affect.

Quote from: FloundermanClock;1913290Majestic? You stitched it together from stiff old socks!

And what of it sir?! You filthy Hatless simpleton.

Quote from: FloundermanClock;1913287I exclusively do cabbie hat voyeurism. We have discussed this. And for the last time, a trilby is just a fucking fedora with a fancy name. THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE YOU ENORMOUS DOUCHEBAG.

Silence, you will not tarnish the good name of such a majestic example of gentlemanly headgarment.

Quote from: FloundermanClock;1913283You want him? Have him, I get enough of him already. Constantly harassing me on skype to watch him masturbate into a trilby. I called it a bowler once and he got really mad.

You will watch, you destitute irish whore.

Quote from: DumpsterClock;1913233i miss maltese clock

That's dumb.

now let's compare


Ã, Ã, Ã, Shit Ã, Ã, Ã, Ã, Good

This is vaguely surprising.

Quote from: Kombucha;1536326wat

he's sexually attracted to nite owl, as evident in how when he shakes his hand, he holds on a bit too long, just like nite owl did for silk spectre, also, rorschach accuses viedt of being gay. Rorschach also finds women to be uncomfortable at best, and he finded silk spectre to be morally represhensible, in her short skirt.

I said repressed, not obviously

Quote from: Marlix Wright;1536330Yeah, I don't remember that either.

I'm not surprised, you didn't realize that rorschach knew he was going to die either.

Quote from: peyote;1536277i'd be more mad at someone for seeing it without reading the masterpiece of the book before hand.

^