News:

If you need instructions on how to get through the hotels, check out the enclosed instruction book.

Main Menu

Eh, First try?

Farted by John Deere Clock, April 24, 2008, 09:03:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

HeinekenClock

Quote from: ZeitmiserZeitmesser;1298615It's a matter of my opinion that gloss is ugly and gaudy. I would find it acceptable iff the material being drawn is a glossy thing, like pearls. But then I hate the look of pearls, too.
Well there's gloss and there's gloss.

Loki Clock

Both of those images make me want to shoot small children.

HeinekenClock

Quote from: ZeitmiserZeitmesser;1299264Both of those images make me want to shoot small children.
Noh!

Loki Clock

Yes. It's unrealistic, disgusting, and needlessly shiny.

John Deere Clock

Lol, I check this thread after 10 days about cause well.. Ya ive been recording in NH with the band and shit,  Umm All good suggestions ill get right on to making edits to my clock,  Thanks everyone who posted.
Woah

John Deere Clock

Sorry for the double post,  Well i finished my .fla.  If anyone would like to see / Use it in a movie go ahead. http://www.clockcrew.cc/talk/library.php?do=detail&item=3380&nocache=246    Please tell me how it is :D
Woah

CubeMelonClock

Quote from: ZeitmiserZeitmesser;1299294Yes. It's unrealistic, disgusting, and needlessly shiny.

It being "unrealistic" is irrelevant because art doesn't have to be realistic.

"Disgusting" is an obvious matter of opinion.

"Needless" is an arbitrary assessment, not to mention a pompous one -- if the artist feels it is needed to convey what they want, then how can another person say it is needless?

I don't even use gloss anymore by the way because I have grown out of it, I am just playing devils advocate. I'd even go so far as to say I agree with you to a large extent, I just feel like it is wrong to be so imposing based your reasons.


TheSponge

Quote from: ZeitmiserZeitmesser;1299294Yes. It's unrealistic, disgusting, and needlessly shiny.

Damn sir, you act like he posted a picture of Amy Winehouse.

Loki Clock

Post a screenshot of the fla, I don't have CS3. :c

Quote from: CubeMelonClock;1300866"Needless" is an arbitrary assessment, not to mention a pompous one -- if the artist feels it is needed to convey what they want, then how can another person say it is needless?

Needless is an opinion as well, and I don't feel anything needs to be that shiny and in that particular manner of shine.

Quote from: CubeMelonClock;1300866It being "unrealistic" is irrelevant because art doesn't have to be realistic.

The effect is used most frequently by realists trying to use a cheap effect to add perceived depth, quality, and complexity to their work that they were too shitty to attain by ingenious methods unique to the artist's style, making it a polished turd that nevertheless dupes the undiscerning.

Quote from: TheSponge;1301269Damn sir, you act like he posted a picture of Amy Winehouse.

They're, mathematically, intrinsically related.

CubeMelonClock

Somebody really hates gloss!!


Did gloss touch you inappropriately as a child?


Loki Clock

Quote from: CubeMelonClock;1301569Somebody really hates gloss!!

With the passion of a thousand burning suns.

Yes.

Companion Cube Clock

Well I used mild gloss/shadows for my Companion Cube .fla in my sig. I think it turned out quite fine actually.
[flash]http://spamtheweb.com/ul/upload/091107/72583_companionsig.swf width=450 height=200[/flash]
As of Monday, October 29, 2007 6:42 PM pacific time, I Vox, have
been given the name Companion Cube Clock by OvenmittClock.

crock pot pot roadt

Quote from: Companion Cube Clock;1305938Well I used mild gloss/shadows for my Companion Cube .fla in my sig. I think it turned out quite fine actually.

get ready for mass flaming then

PecanClock

Quote from: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad;1305947get ready for mass flaming then

I don't see why, it looks gorgeous.

John Deere Clock

lawl i love how this has gone into a gloss flame war... Anyways ya, Comments on my .fla?
Woah

Loki Clock

Quote from: FloppyDiskClock;1305952Gloss when done correctly can look rather spiffy, take this 8ball I done about 2 years ago for an example.

[flash]http://bay01.imagebay.com/_upload/img/34/fff.swf width=250 height=250 wmode=transparent[/flash]

The gloss just needs to be blended in correctly for it to look natural. You can achieve this by using lots of gradients and using soften fill edges.

Yes. With great effort, you too can make the quality of your 8-ball drawing be completely undermined by the lense flare filter in Photoshop.

Loki Clock

Quote from: Companion Cube Clock;1305938Well I used mild gloss/shadows for my Companion Cube .fla in my sig. I think it turned out quite fine actually.

Gloss is inherently not mild. Otherwise it's not glossy. It's intended to emulate paints in the glossy extreme of mattes, high gloss being that most extreme matte, which is incredibly unrealistic when drawing anything that isn't covered in extremely glossy paint, but which mediocre art faggots find incredibly convenient for polishing their turds and making their art faggot brand e-penis grow to Lock Legion calibur.


A polished turd/trashcan.

What you used in your signature was a very well executed imitation of radiosity effects, as well as the Phong shading model, not gloss, and while I admit that it can be a little drippy at times, it is still pretty damn well acceptable.

satan will destroy you

more alpha shading sass noise balls cannons blur  props dancers stuff  legs   gradient

satan will destroy you


satan will destroy you