So what's up with...

[FileCabinetClock]

[buttplug]

Quite some philosopher you are, Mr.PhilosopherClock

[FileCabinetClock]

um guys im a philosopher have u ever thought im gonna die its crazy but u r ur gonna die WoAHH

[crock pot pot roadt]

[buttplug]

Any luck with stalking Tim and Eric, Filey?

[FileCabinetClock]

Any luck with stalking Tim and Eric, Filey?

i was trying to think of a witty response to that, but then i was like: "oh yeah, i don't usually think of those. i usually just troll."

[LuigiClock]

If you get banned from chat, then you suck and should stop while your at it

[LuigiClock]

also filecabinet, you should see them live

[FileCabinetClock]

also filecabinet, you should see them live

i've seen some pics from adult swim, it looks brilliant

[buttplug]

TARGE

CH CH CH

TARGE

CH CH CH UH

[DoxosopherClock]

Because your post were so fucking stupid it was unimaginable.


Physics means nothing.
Science is trash.
The biggest question in life is whether one should commit suicide or not.

You don't believe in science, existence, or anything at all. Yet, you still find time to tell everyone else that they are wrong. That our physical evidence is only as we percieve and that our perception are untrue. Which, may vary well be true but to discredit all natural laws, physics, and sciences all together because you assume it to be a lie is ignorance at its finest.

You clearly do not study Neurology, any Sciences, Cosmology or Astrology. You know nothing of what you preach and choose ignorants to remain Nihilistic.

I don't see how my post was stupid. Your post is nothing but pretentious shit. I never went about telling people that they were wrong; that was what everyone in the room was telling me. I have no abandoned science for that sole assumption; I have abandoned it because it has given us nothing but dash-board knowledge about life. It has simply told us "how" instead of "why". There is nothing impressive about analytical description of a natural phenomena.

I don't study Neurology, any sciences, cosmology, or astrology? Considering astrology is basically pseudo-science, I surely don't study that, Ms. Cleo. In regards to neurology, and any other sciences, I actually did study those on the undergraduate level, and I chose not to pursue them because in order to be successful in them it requires you to wear blinders to the rest of the world. Specialization is lame.

[BreadfruitClock]

are you some kind of emo or hippie or something

really god damn i have no idea how to read that post

[BobbyClock]

You should be banned from the forum as well

[DoxosopherClock]

I fucking hate emos and hippies. Scene kids are too fucking cool.

[DigitalLemonClock]

none of that personal view hocus pocus round these parts

also lol astrology

[Biggskoo]

Physics means nothing.
Science is trash.
The biggest question in life is whether one should commit suicide or not.

in all fairness this is completely 100% true

[ChimeClock]

hahahahhahah
 
this guy's gonna go places

[NesquikClock]

I fucking hate emos and hippies. Scene kids are too fucking cool.

... huh?

[AlbinoClock]

Yeah, you were asking us to assume that time was infinite and then with absolutely no connecting point insisting that that meant it repeated itself over and over again. Then once we mentioned something about physics you said physics is bullshit and science is dogmatic trash based on speculation. You're a fucking idiot.

Allow me to clear something up for you, the thing you think of as "science" does not exist. Science is not a body of dogmas that dictate how the universe works. The scientific method is a way of figuring out how the things in our world function. Information obtained scientifically might occasionally turn out to be incorrect, but that doesn't invalidate the scientific method.

There is one assumption that is required in order for any information to be obtained from the scientific method, and that's the assumption that our basic sensory information is reasonably accurate. The thing is, it doesn't really matter whether or not our information is actually accurate as long as it holds up to testing and has practical applications. We can never answer the question of how accurate our perception is, so in order to move forward at all we have to just go with it.

As to being rude, I don't feel that I have any obligation to reward complete idiocy with politeness. Personally, I don't think people who think the scientific method isn't important should be allowed to benefit from any technology, let alone post on the internet.

[LuxenbergClock]

Getting banned from the chat room the first time I ever go in there? Albino clock is rude and myopic to say the least. How can you call someone ignorant and over assumptive without realizing you possess these same qualities yourself?

oh my god fuck off