You guys are gay

[DigitalLemonClock]

enough flirting, everyone pull 'em out

[TheClockNessMonster]

Mocha and Patriot are mutually queerosexual for each other.

that's shits a double negative. your saying they straight!

[Slurpee]

that's shits a double negative. your saying they straight!

gay is not a negative

[AstronautClock]

[TheClockNessMonster]

gay is not a negative

in not saying gay is a negative. it like when you got two things that are the same, the cancel each other out. like how adding -5 to 5 makes 0, or multiplying -3 by -3 makes +9

[Slurpee]

I don't know how to break this to you but 1 plus 1 isn't zero

if you apply a positive attribute qualifier twice- a fat, fat man- you picture a very fat man.
if you apply a negative qualifier twice- not, not fat- that means fat.

what system of logic are you applying to the quality of being gay, that using it twice means the opposite, but doesn't operate on the assumption that being gay is a negative?

[TheClockNessMonster]

I don't know how to break this to you but 1 plus 1 isn't zero

if you apply a positive attribute qualifier twice- a fat, fat man- you picture a very fat man.
if you apply a negative qualifier twice- not, not fat- that means fat.

what system of logic are you applying to the quality of being gay, that using it twice means the opposite, but doesn't operate on the assumption that being gay is a negative?

yes. the double negative was just the first way i could think of to explain it in the 10 seconds i sent writing the post. but in my way of logic it is what your thinking of when you said "that using it twice means the opposite, but doesn't operate on  the assumption that being gay is a negative" but never mind. if its confusing maybe it belongs in the twilight zone.

[TheClockNessMonster]

[Sheep]

I know I am <3

[Silly Putty Clock]

• Gay people are not straight.
• Therefore, double gay people are double not straight.
• This makes them not not straight.
• That's a double negative.
• Therefore, double gay people are straight.

Q.E.D. BRO

[AstronautClock]

• Gay people are not straight.
• Therefore, double gay people are double not straight.
• This makes them not not straight.
• That's a double negative.
• Therefore, double gay people are straight.

Q.E.D. BRO

what is a double bisexual

[BoltClock]

what is a double bisexual

a quadrisexual of course

[RobClock]

what is a double bisexual

indecisive prick.

[Asshatclock]

This is not news.

[TheClockNessMonster]

• Gay people are not straight.
• Therefore, double gay people are double not straight.
• This makes them not not straight.
• That's a double negative.
• Therefore, double gay people are straight.

Q.E.D. BRO

thank you for your evidence against double-gay-straight people.

[PowerGloveClock]

you may be double gay but i'm ultra gay

[BBQBEEFBURGERMAN]

I am da gayest gay around here and there's no denying that

[FLOUNDERMAN_CLOCK]

I am da gayest gay around here and there's no denying that

Fuck you I could outgay you any gay of the week.

[Slurpee]

yes. the double negative was just the first way i could think of to explain it in the 10 seconds i sent writing the post. but in my way of logic it is what your thinking of when you said "that using it twice means the opposite, but doesn't operate on  the assumption that being gay is a negative" but never mind. if its confusing maybe it belongs in the twilight zone.

there is no system of logic where doubles of a positive attribution cancel each other out.
not even bizarro world.

• Gay people are not straight.
• Therefore, double gay people are double not straight.
• This makes them not not straight.
• That's a double negative.
• Therefore, double gay people are straight.

Q.E.D. BRO

that's not a fucking qed you dipshit you're operating on the false pretense that an attribute is defined by what it doesn't signify.
just because an attribute precludes other attributes doesn't mean it defines no unique characteristics of its own. you're taking straight as a uniquely positive qualifier, and devaluing alternatives based on to what extent they embody the former. it doesn't work like that.

by your reasoning, we can also say gay people are not asexual, therefore double gay people are not not asexual, therefore double gay people are asexual.
we can equally conclude straight straight means pansexual, bisexual bisexual means gay, or asexual asexual means straight.

you're just wrong.

[DWARFINATORclock]

by your reasoning, we can also say gay people are not asexual, therefore double gay people are not not asexual, therefore double gay people are asexual.
we can equally conclude straight straight means pansexual, bisexual bisexual means gay, or asexual asexual means straight.