it's a football

[Roman Collar Clock]

lololololololololol

[Topcatyo]

Actually, I just find certain ones to be witty.

I am an intellectual. I use much of whatever money I have to go out and buy books on various sciences, and arts, I spend much of my free time studying new things, because I value nothing else above logic and the pursuit of knowledge, I've been in the gifted student program since 1st grade, and I've been in the high honor roll since it was available in 7th grade. I watch almost nothing on TV besides History channel, Discovery Health, and sometimes Discovery, and I am generally an intelligent and dignified person.

Your assumptions about what people are like based on what they like will not hold true like you think they will.

And, just on the opposite side of the spectrum, I only find few Youtube Poops enjoyable.

I am a... something.  I don't make money because I don't have a job and really don't want one.  I spend my free time goofing off in any way possible and generally avoiding studying at all costs.  I value nothing else above enjoying life and I don't really care much for the pursuit of knowledge at all.  The only channels I watch are Cartoon Network (if something good is on), Nickelodeon (if Spongebob is on), sometimes G4 (if it's one of the two shows on there that doesn't suck) and Comedy Central (if it's good).
Ironically, though, I get straight A's (mostly, except for the occasional B+), and have been in the gifted program since fifth grade.

While it's not the complete opposite, it's close.
All-in-all, generalizing is bad.

[TequilaClock]

[SoBe Clock]

Sorry but that is kind of what a pseudo-intellectual is man.

1.     pseudo-intellectual    

   

1. One who attempts to flex intellect that does not exist within his or her own mind.

2. Can probably be found with a thesaurus in hand, while in a chat room, looking up new insults that are synonymous with "stupid" in order to boost his or her own undeserved ego.

3. Typical cases of pseudo-intellectualism involve pre-pubescent 15 year olds that think they have everything figured out, including, but not limited to: life, religion, politics, education, and sex. Ironically, they have never quite experienced either of the aforementioned.

4. Pretends he or she has an opinion.

5. Posseses a severe tendency to blindly and wholeheartedly believe any bullshit they hear, only to subsequently regurgitate the misinformation to anyone they see in an asinine attempt to appear more intelligent than a used, broken condom.

6. Should the victim of the verbal onslaught happen to have a differing opinion, the pseudo-intellectual will revert to his or her thesaurus and insult the opposition with words he or she never knew existed, and probably cannot even pronounce.

7. Annoyingly and constantly refers to the word antidisestablishmentarian ism, as if knowledge of said word defined his or her illegitimately high intelligence quotient.

8. Typically a hypocrite; creates many, many contradictions. Most online grammar/spelling Nazis can relate.

9. Always ends a bullshit "argument" with, "I win, so stfu." Win what, dipshits? Your opinions weren't fact in the first place.





I'm an intellectual, I'm far above petty things such as what was listed there.

[buttplug]

I'm an intellectual, I'm far above petty things such as what was listed there.

That is proof of you being a pseudo intellectual hahahaha

[TremcladClock]

Wow, this thread is really, really terrible.

[buttplug]

Wow, this thread is really, really terrible.

TREMCLAD FLIES HIIIIGH, HIIIIGH ABOVE EVERYONE ELSE WHO IS SHIIIIIIIIT

[SoBe Clock]

And, just on the opposite side of the spectrum, I only find few Youtube Poops enjoyable.

I am a... something.  I don't make money because I don't have a job and really don't want one.  I spend my free time goofing off in any way possible and generally avoiding studying at all costs.  I value nothing else above enjoying life and I don't really care much for the pursuit of knowledge at all.  The only channels I watch are Cartoon Network (if something good is on), Nickelodeon (if Spongebob is on), sometimes G4 (if it's one of the two shows on there that doesn't suck) and Comedy Central (if it's good).
Ironically, though, I get straight A's (mostly, except for the occasional B+), and have been in the gifted program since fifth grade.

While it's not the complete opposite, it's close.
All-in-all, generalizing is bad.
[/IMG]

And you're an awesome person, and it's not in anybody's place to judge you based off what you like and tell you wether you're smart or not because of the things you enjoy!

That is proof of you being a pseudo intellectual hahahaha

So because I said I'm above idioticy that means I, to, am an idiot?
I don't do any of the things in those definitions.
I'm afraid we're not going to agree on this subject. Call me what you want. I know where I stand and what is right about me. You, being someone randomly talking to me over the internet, have no right to ever tell me what I am or anything about me.

Let's be friends I don't like arguing with people that I like.

[TequilaClock]

Wow, this thread is really, really terrible.

[Topcatyo]

And you're an awesome person, and it's not in anybody's place to judge you based off what you like and tell you wether you're smart or not because of the things you enjoy!

Thank you, and the same goes for you

[TequilaClock]

Pyro, you look like an idiot now. What have you done?



Why does it say 2004?

Oh excuse me, I meant 3

Oh shit, I am so stupid my gosh.

I could take credit for this but Tequila, Pyro, and Pin did all the work.

You should cooperate more, jeez man.

[SoBe Clock]

Pyro, you look like an idiot now. What have you done?

I'm SoBe Clock by the way.

I look like an idiot by proving that your biased generalizations are incorrect?

You accused me of being immature and idiotic for liking some Youtube poops, I described myself, showing the opposite.


EDIT: I can see you're not going to use any sort of logic at all in this discussion. Forget it, any efforts I make to show you how irrational you're being are going to waste. I won't hold our disagreements against you though, as long as you don't troll me again in the future.

[SoBe Clock]

I think ButtPlug won, actually. You should read his post(s).

Oh yeah, because any of you here totally know what I'm like in real life and can accurately judge my character and personality.

As I said, you're not being logical, so I'd like to stop this pointless arguement. Stop trying to keep the flame war going please.

[FluxCapacitorClock]

Ugh, there's more to being an intelligent deep-thinker than books and general knowledge. Being considered a genius in the United States school system isn't exactly difficult. That's something I realized my senior year. The only reason everyone doesn't have straight A's is simple laziness and a lack of motivation to study and learn the things they need to learn to do well in the classes. Most teachers nowadays will look for every possible little thing to give their students extra points that they don't deserve. In my sophomore year, my Algebra teacher gave us 5 bathroom passes at the beginning of the year. Every pass that we didn't use and turned back in at the end of the year would equal an entire point added onto your average. Several students who didn't do any work during the entire semester, myself included, passed only because of those. I know now that it was absolutely ridiculous for me to be able to pass like that. Being book smart before the college level really is fairly useless, as so many kids are just slipping through in that manner, without actually learning anything. There are even certain school systems that have made failing an impossibility, and give students as many tries as they need to get excellent grades.

Doing good and having great grades in school does not necessarily make you intelligent.

idioticy

I love you Sobe but I have to be a whore and point out that this isn't a word. _poogle_

[Solenoidclock]

I find YTP entertaining. I'm not going to argue it as some kind of high art, but that doesn't make me a pseudo-intellectual.

As for Sobe, I think his pursuits and values are pretty genuine. Misspelling idiocy is a moot point.

[AirPumpClock]

hahahaha

Also, Youtube Poop is funny. Sure, many people try and fail miserably, but there are quite a few gems out there if you look hard enough.

Also, it's obvious that flaming SoBe for no good reason is silly, seeing as he is wearing a flame-retardant suit. I don't even know why he's getting beat up here, I'm the one who made this thread. Some of us are attempting to shove him into a corner.

Hmmm, Cadillac? Seriously, flame me instead if anyone. I'm used to it.

[AirPumpClock]

I hate to nitpick here, and I do enjoy (quality) YTPs on occasion, but there is zero wit involved in YouTube Poop. Wit is all about being clever - YouTube Poop is all about repetition and timing and loud noises and making Robotnik say 'penis.' It can be funny, but it can hardly be called witty.

I don't know, some poops are witty. Plus, it's hard to find the right words to say when you feel like everybody is attempting to flame you (mostly due to the combination of Cadillac and all the nitpicking stemming from this silly spat).

Just about every thread involving me and Cadillac.

[FluxCapacitorClock]

Sobe is good people.

[TequilaClock]

I hate to nitpick here, and I do enjoy (quality) YTPs on occasion, but there is zero wit involved in YouTube Poop. Wit is all about being clever - YouTube Poop is all about repetition and timing and loud noises and making Robotnik say 'penis.' It can be funny, but it can hardly be called witty.

Good one:

• Not overused material
• Clever uses of different media
• Sophisticated effects
• No overused trends
• Great interaction in the different clips without being so "RANDOM"

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=h-D6zSQw6uk

Lame one:

• Follows the trend
• Tries hard to be funny
• Long pauses
• Same old clips
• Too repetitive jokes
• WindowsMovieMaker

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=VoTgraJKDA4&feature=related

[AirPumpClock]

Cadillac and I.

Ho ho, that is where you are wrong, my friend. A common English mistake.

Me is used for direct and indirect objects, while I is used as the subject and predicate nominative, or words that are synonymous to the subject.

Try reading that sentence with the two different subjects separately. "I" doesn't make sense.

Just about every thread involving I.

Just about every thread involving me.

Just about every thread involving Cadillac.

Also, "just about every thread" is the subject.