News:

If you need instructions on how to get through the hotels, check out the enclosed instruction book.

Main Menu

Initiative to Remove CorpsegrinderClock from the position of Super Moderator

Farted by AlbinoClock, September 29, 2011, 07:23:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Demod Corpsegrinder?

es
11 (100%)
o
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 39

Voting closed: October 06, 2011, 07:23:56 PM

Biggskoo

has the staff had fun reading my grid posts because i think they were all pretty great

Biggskoo

also if one can't understand why the "corpsegrinder special" is seen as a long and unwieldy posting method even though the actual content may itself be similar to other posts that do not employ said method, i don't know how anyone could ever make it clear to you

Biggskoo


DWARFINATORclock

Quote from: HeinekenClock;1861111By making the clock crew a democracy, you've created a system where there's two parties: the self proclaimed diehards and then there's the rest. The minority here is the most obnoxious, loudest group of people here. Dear god, you've made republicans. And this forum is their Fox News.

in case you havent noticed, there have always been loud obnoxious minority groups in the clock crew.

i also havent heard anyone proclaim themselves to be die hards.

you guys all think this stuff is new but this has been happening for 10 years now

HeinekenClock

Quote from: DWARFINATORclock;1861137in case you havent noticed, there have always been loud obnoxious minority groups in the clock crew.
i also havent heard anyone proclaim themselves to be die hards.
you guys all think this stuff is new but this has been happening for 10 years now

Okay, nobody actually called themselves diehards but you know exactly what I mean. I also admit every change in staff has met with people unhappy with how things are run, however, right now we have people that are actively looking for reasons to troll and harass other members. Nobody actually gave a shit about Blob's stolen username, at least not nearly enough as it was made out to be. That was an exercise in how much they could use this system to embarass or at least bait the current staff into fucking up in some way. I'm not sure why everyone is so dead set on having "their" A-Team in charge, when the elected staff is doing just fine. Remember when posting something slightly off-color resulted in a 30-day ban by whoever had a shitty mood? I'm not sure if we have that little members left, but the Grinder is awfully quiet compared to two years ago and if someone shows up there, it's nearly always a day or three. Complaining about a ban instantly resulted in 2 extra months being tagged on to it, now there's people absolutely LOSING THEIR SHIT over three-day bans and the staff basically has to act like they're goddamn judges being held to account for an innocent life sentence.

If people focused on getting along instead of fighting for their god-given right to have their buddy in charge, this subforum would be empty. If I try to start a regular conversation about a random topic that may or may not end up getting interesting, the first reaction is a single line that basically says "I'm posting here because I don't want this to go anywhere". I understand you are now going to say that was a legitimate reaction to the thread, but it wasn't, because if it was you would have contributed a better version of what was, in your opinion, a bad example (for instance). I poke fun at you in a spam forum thread that was nothing more than an attempt to get on CGC's nerves, what happens? Exactly, this shit:
:capper::capper::capper:

You drag out a horse that's little more than bones by now and start beating it. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why we're not attracting any new members.
Because when some new guy joins up, we absolutely never ever forget about the fact they make sprite movies, concentrate as hard as we can on telling them their negative traits until they leave. While maybe we could all grow the fuck up, pull someone aside (maybe add them on AIM and, I don't know, explain how things work), and help someone improve themselves while gaining an active, productive member.

Biggskoo

Quote from: HeinekenClock;1861141Complaining about a ban instantly resulted in 2 extra months being tagged on to it, now there's people absolutely LOSING THEIR SHIT over three-day bans and the staff basically has to act like they're goddamn judges being held to account for an innocent life sentence.

now?

haha someone should read that dang grid.

AlbinoClock

Quote from: RibsClock;1861117I frankly kind of hope that the few people who are just, well, trying to break it....stop trying to break it!

Thinking that you are a crappy mod who abuses his power is not synonymous with trying to "break democracy". People who have a problem with you aren't just having fun fucking with the system, they think your behavior is a problem.

HeinekenClock

Quote from: AlbinoClock;1861144Thinking that you are a crappy mod who abuses his power is not synonymous with trying to "break democracy". People who have a problem with you aren't just having fun fucking with the system, they think your behavior is a problem.

So far, it looks like there's ten people who dislike corpsegrinder since well before he was smod, and 27 people who do not give a shit because there's absolutely nothing wrong with the way things are being run. You're creating reasons to get done what you want for different reasons, also known as fabricated outrage.

Quote from: Biggskoo;1861143now?
haha someone should read that dang grid.

Haha someone should give me access then olololol, as if.

We have created a system where we can appeal three-day bans that are given, mostly, for completely legitimate reasons. This is not how it should be, even if someone is banned unfairly, the smods here are referees, not policemen. When a decision is made, the decision is made. It's different for permabans or insane, out of proportion month-long bans.

AlbinoClock

Quote from: HeinekenClock;1861141If people focused on getting along instead of fighting for their god-given right to have their buddy in charge, this subforum would be empty.

I don't think that's the issue here, it certainly isn't for me. Absinthe and Sarez are both admins, so yeah, my buddies are already in charge. My problem is Corpse and the way he's been acting. Small potatoes or not, he's not dealing at all well with the issues that are coming up. If he'd back off and let someone else take care of shit getting stired up, it would settle down. Look at how quickly the Blob situation quieted down when Slurpee and Absinthe actually said something meaningful. That's how to be a good member of the staff. Corpse doesn't defuse drama, he adds fuel to the fire.

AlbinoClock

Also you are totally paranoid about that little 4 post thread. I wouldn't call it kwal either.

HeinekenClock

Quote from: AlbinoClock;1861148Also you are totally paranoid about that little 4 post thread. I wouldn't call it kwal either.

That's not the point. The point is that if that post was rephrased, it was be constructive to the thread instead of a conversation ender. It's like saying "well that's your opinion", it's a shitty thing to do because afterwards there's nowhere to go. It's not about the thread, it's about posting like that because you don't like either someone, or because you don't like the thread. It's the reason the spam forum suddenly holds semi-coherent threads instead of "BACON BACON SPAM SPAM Ã,Â¥Ã,Â¥Ã,Â¥Ã,Â¥" because we can justifiably be assholes to each other all the time because apparently that's how we want to treat each other. I move to change the spam forum link to this because that's the level of decency they expect there.

AlbinoClock

Quote from: HeinekenClock;1861149That's not the point. The point is that if that post was rephrased, it was be constructive to the thread instead of a conversation ender. It's like saying "well that's your opinion", it's a shitty thing to do because afterwards there's nowhere to go. It's not about the thread, it's about posting like that because you don't like either someone, or because you don't like the thread. It's the reason the spam forum suddenly holds semi-coherent threads instead of "BACON BACON SPAM SPAM Ã,Â¥Ã,Â¥Ã,Â¥Ã,Â¥" because we can justifiably be assholes to each other all the time because apparently that's how we want to treat each other. I move to change the spam forum link to this because that's the level of decency they expect there.

I can agree that Dwarf is adversarial sometimes, but I really think you're freaking out over nothing. All he said was that he wouldn't call a jelly a kwal. I wouldn't either. I can't think of any reason why you would either, but that's probably because kwal means something in Dutch. Whatever, Dwarf disagrees with you. That is totally irrelevant to any of this.

HeinekenClock

Congrats on posting the same point you already made in longer form without actually reacting to mine.

AlbinoClock

Quote from: HeinekenClock;1861174Congrats on posting the same point you already made in longer form without actually reacting to mine.

It's still true and you're still crazy.



HeinekenClock

Quote from: clammo;1861178this system is supposed to be built on fairness for everyone, so if someone is banned for 3 days at the whim of some self-righteous prick with a bone to pick, then its not really fair for everyone is it?

There's no way you can be completely fair. If you can appeal each and every ban it's going to turn into a whiny, annoying clock crew, because of course everyone who's banned will object to that. The point of holding elections is to put the power of moderation into the hands of who the majority thinks is best, and if that person does a shitty job at it, guess what happens at the next elections? Hooray, democracy at work!

Quotesomebody should do that for you

This is exactly the kind of shitposting I'm talking about. If I may end in a similarly adult fashion: get the fuck out.

HookshotClock


HeinekenClock

Also, the facts only the votes for "no" are increasing is because, as I've previously brought up, this is not about Corpsegrinder's way of doing his job, this is about the dozen or so people who have a personal problem with this guy coming together and seeing if they can pull this shit off. I wonder how many of those were in your staff?

DWARFINATORclock

Quote from: HeinekenClock;1861206Also, the facts only the votes for "no" are increasing is because, as I've previously brought up, this is not about Corpsegrinder's way of doing his job, this is about the dozen or so people who have a personal problem with this guy coming together and seeing if they can pull this shit off. I wonder how many of those were in your staff?

absinthe, pineapple, sobe, topcat, zen micro, vcr were all on "clam's staff" and are still on the staff now fyi

so was zombie lincoln before he lost his power due to inactivity