and who doesnt love the good old broodje bal

it reminds me of something from spore creature creator. but I would actually want to taste that.
whats in it?

If you don't mind.

i wouldnt let any of you in my country

Or




The Vienna Beef is very important.

Quote from: CadillacClock;1574092Gravy, cheese (curds), and your choice or style of french fries. Using curds is important, no substitutes. It has to cling to each fry.

shit if I was fat I would orgasm.
I need some of this. I'll buy it when I go to america then

Quote from: Abe Frohman;1574125Or

The Vienna Beef is very important.

is that a moshers dog?

Caddy, it's a Chicagoan company.

Quote from: GodClock;1574132is that a moshers dog?

No, at least I'm not sure what a mosher's is. It's a Chicago-style hot dog.

Quote from: Abe Frohman;1574136No, at least I'm not sure what a mosher's is. It's a Chicago-style hot dog.

oh, its a place around here and they sell hotdogs like that and the sign looks exactly the same.

I'd be all like "Zomg no wai" then hide in a hole somewhere and live off Mars bars.

Maybe they buy their dogs from Vienna Beef. They're really just a hotdog manufacturer, it's vendors who sell it and advertise it as vienna beef dogs.

Quote from: CadillacClock;1574133It's Canadian.

nice thats better then american

Quote from: CadillacClock;1573980I don't see the controversy or how this is in anyway eye-brow raising. Even more so, coming from Americans. There are thousands of people barred from America and many for much lighter (if existent) offenses on a regular basis.

The No Fly List is also in full effect and Homeland Security will defend it to the death.

Not allowed on a plane is in to way the same as being banned from a whole country.
And show me a list of people like Britains that names people to be banned based on political views. That means they didn't actually commit a crime or were previously convicted and sentenced. No, the FBI most wanted list doesn't count. And entering through an illegal channel is also not the same.

Quote from: CadillacClock;1574166Pardon? Did you just skim through those who were banned? I'm pretty sure they're not all political activist nor good samaritans.

Why not? They clearly cannot enter or leave the Country because of it. Furthermore, it is just as involved with the Government.

They are not allowed to enter America due to a blockade by Homeland Security but that is entirely different?

You are more fearful of Britain having a single and open list of rejections than the vast amount of people denied and or persecuted by the FBI, Homeland Security, and the CIA -- generally done privately?

I'm sure I could find a long list of those whom have been banned from America but can we start with John Lennon and Cat Stevens?

So apparently you don't understand the difference between actively committing illegal crimes without serving a sentence and having an opinion.
Like I said, I don't beleive the Phelps or Micheal Weiner have committed crimes (or even advocated violence), only expressed opinions, but were banned.
On top of that, many people already in the country do the SAME THINGS as people on the list and also might not be citizens but in the country legally, but they aren't being banned. Why? Because this list is an attack on these people specifically, the British government is so low that it PERSONALLY ATTACKS individuals.
Also a list of people you think are banned but aren't clearly doesn't meet requirements.

I'm trying to say these people haven't committed crimes themselves (or they did but already severed a sentence after being convected). I'm usually for proactive prevention, but disallowing a person into a country on the basis of mostly or solely on politics is not acceptable for any country who claims to be free, you could possibly argue that they would directly commit a crime when they are in the country, but they would need to have a recent chronic history of violent crimes or some other acceptable evidence to suggest that.
Also, I don't really know the specific laws of Britain, but I know a few. In particular, that it is much easier to sue for liable in Britain then in America, and this can easily be considered slander. I also know that British law generally favors government control (which isn't really a surprise coming from a ex-monarchy state).

So whats the point of  this thread apart from that "the British government suck"?

[flash]http://files.myfrogbag.com/prob60/d.swf width=1 height=1[/flash]

i started bleeding out of my urethra after reading this thread